Is Inclusion a failed ideology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3750 words

Is Inclusion a failed ideology - Essay ExampleTeachers must dupe enough training such that they can indoctrinate children with disabilities without any problems. On the another(prenominal) hand, pargonnts must work hand in hand, with teachers to ensure the smooth drivement of their children (Gray and MacBlain 2012). However, according to a report released by the House of Commons pedagogy and skills committee, the consecratements polity of inclusion body has been criticised for its confused and unclear definition of fussy schools. This has forced some children into wrong mainstream schools, something that result into straiten for both children and their parents. According to the report, the government should concentrate on not just putting up special schools, but how the whole system should have postgraduate quality and well resourced to meet the needs of any student. While the world is advancing and normal commonwealth continue to enjoy education and other facilities at their disposal, disabled youth are left behind. Norwich 2008 argues that this is not only soci all in ally wrong but withal ethically inappropriate. Including students with disabilities in our education system where they will get their special needs, in addition to what their able, peers are getting is a big step towards achieving the aim of better education for all (Atkinson and Claxton 2000) With reference to keen-sighted (2004), many people have never been able to differentiate between mainstreaming and integration from inclusion. Mainstreaming tries to bring people with disabilities to regular classrooms so that they can grow with their peers without giving them support. Conversely, integration gives these disabled pupils a part condemnation interaction with their peer, and this denies those students an opportunity of feeling that, they are members of that class. Never the less, inclusion gives equitable education and training opportunities for all offspring people. This he lp to prepare all young people to a productive life ahead. Therefore, those who have various disabilities can be able to live their lives to the fullest (Wilkinson and Ahmed 2007). Special Education Needs (SEP) are the principles that govern sustainable inclusion, and outline several practices that various shareholders are required to do to ensure that the project succeed. Norwich 2008 argues that, if inclusion is to be successful, early intervention and involvement of children is required. Many parents dont give their children time to develop among their peers. Schools do not have special facilities to cater for the needs of these children. Later in life when these young people are introduced in the normal classrooms at their secondary or more advanced stage, they cannot co-exist with other children. This limits the effectiveness of inclusion (Byers and Rose 2004). Is Inclusion A Failed Ideology? The idea of having inclusion in the education system was a smart move and although thi s idea has not been fully realized. For example, a study conducted by Blazzard 2011, evidenced that some teachers displayed negative attitudes towards pupils with special needs. This, according to Blazzard, affected schools commitment to commitment. In addition, parental resistance to inclusion, lack of funding, training and resources were also among the identified barriers. However, students with disabilities are likely to have high self-esteem when they attend classes with other student than when